September 8, 2008...11:42 am

Should Lewis Hamilton’s Belgian Grand Prix win be reinstated?

Jump to Comments
Lewis Hamilton's Belgian GP win was short-lived

Lewis Hamilton's Belgian GP win was short-lived

Lewis Hamilton won yesterday’s Belgian Grand Prix – but two hours after the race, the stewards took his victory away under controversial circumstances.

The penalty hinged on Hamilton’s attempt to pass Kimi Raikkonen on lap 42. Raikkonen forced Hamilton off the track, meaning Hamilton had to let Raikkonen pass. He did this, but then re-passed Raikkonen at the next corner.

Hamilton penalty meant Felipe Massa inherited the win – Raikkonen crashed out on the penultimate lap. Should Massa have won?

The McLaren team has announed it will appeal the decision against Hamilton. F1’s governing body, the FIA, will hear the appeal at a hearing of the World Motor Sports’ Council, a date for which has not yet been set.

McLaren have had several run-ins with the sports governing body in the last 12 months. Before last year’s Belgian Grand Prix they were famously excluded from the constructors’ championship and fined $100m for alleging using confidential information belonging to Ferrari.

By appealing against Hamilton’s penalty they may risk getting an even stronger punishment.

Do you think Hamilton’s penalty should be overturned? Have your say in the comments below.

35 Comments

  • Looking at the incedent from a totally neutral propective I can understand how a penalty should have been imposed had Hamilton not yielded the advantage. In lieu of the fact that he did and had the initial incident not taken place Hamilton would have overtaken where he did anyway, it does seem to suggest ‘other factors’ are a play here. Not good for the sport

  • well what a joke , clearly the stewards have got it wrong. lewis was alongside kimi at the last corner, kimi turned in and they hit each other, lewis was then in front , he was then radio by mclaren team and decided he MAY have gained an advantage , he backed off to allow kimi back past him , his data shows he lifted to half throttle for a short while and his speed was 6kms slower than kimi at the start line , having let kimi back past he then threw him a dummy into the hairpin, and re passed. the FIA have a problem with mclaren and favour ferrari in all matters , this decision is just to keep the scores closer for the last 5 races its a joke !!!

  • Right at the end it turned into quite a race and I must say the result should have stood.
    F1 officials have devalued that race from a great race to a farce.
    I for one will not be turning into ITV to watch any more races this season. Whats the point in watch, this is not racing but some kind of man hunt against anything Maclarn. Hekki out broke himself in a corner and hit another car as one may do if you are racing as a few drivers did at the first corner of the first lap but none of them got a drive through penalty.
    Whats the point F1 officials might as well just hand the title to ferrari and fine Maclarn another £50,000,000 again just for the fun of it.

  • Spencer Hartless

    Its outrageous for Lewis to have the win taken away. Lewis was making an overtaking move on Kimi and Kimi pushed Lewis off line so he had choice but to go off the track to avoid a collision.
    The advantage was given back to Kimi as they passed the start / finish line and Lewis made another move at the next corner. I watched the race and don’t see how the officials can say Lewis gained an advantage. It all look fair to me.
    At the last Grand Prix Massa was released by his pit crew into the path of another car. This was considered to be a ‘dangerous move’ but no fine and penalty was passed to Massa. Perhaps Lewis should paint his car red as the officials turn a blind eye if your car is scarlet !

  • totally ridiculous decision, he shouldnt have been penalised for this as he won the race fair and square. decisions like this damage the sport and spoil what was a superb race.

  • If Hamilton didnt gain any advantage why was he penalised? As it was clearly the Ferrari driver that forced Hamilton off, shouldn’t he be punished?

    Obvioulsy not as F1 is just one big F1X in Ferrari’s favour

  • i think it,s apauling that hamilton got stripped of a win if they thought he had done wrong then why not a grid penalty at next race!!! any way he did nothing wrong and everyone on the day believed so. It was the best race in F1 for a long time, there’s too much politics in F1 now, no wonder the sport has lost so much support lots of suits with too much money think they can rule it. hamilton is the best thing in a long time to join F1 and the idiots at the top can’t stand it, they have something against him its not the first time this season they have tried to stop his championship battle. they wouldn’t know what real racing is if it bit them in the back side!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • of course lewis should be reinstated. this is yet another instance of the F1 rulers cow towing to a ferrari team who will win by fair means or foul. was hoping to see the end of their underhand ways when shumacher retired.

  • that’s the key…. ‘Raikkonen forced Hamilton off the track’ What else needs to be said?

  • Yes of course Hamilton’s penalty should be overturned, it is the mosr ridiculous thing I have ever seen in F1. We all know that Bernie wants Ferrari to win but this is the worst case of bias yet. Why doesn’t he go the whole way and use his money and clout to change the rules to give Ferrari and its drivers a 40-point headstart at the start of the season and see if everyone can catch up??

  • When was life fair? Hamilton has proved that he does not need FIA assistance. Let them help Ferrari. It will make Hamilton’s eventual triumph that much more satisfying for him and his many fans.

  • Absolutely – there is no way that it makes sense to penalise him 25 seconds. They should let the drivers race and as long as it is all within the spirit of the race, leave them to it. As it is, they are encouraging the drivers to parade around the circuit with no overtaking moves, which is what has made the sport a shadow of its former self already.

  • no he shouldnt get his win back,lucky to get third

  • It was obvious to everyone who watched the race that Lewis gave back the lead to Kimi after he was pushed off the track. How can the stewards give a verdict like this, when it shows up like a sore thumb on the video tape. Lewis has got to win the appeal. No question & no doubt from me.

  • I think the race marshalls were wrong to retrospectively demote Lewis Hamilton to 3rd place after legitimately winning the Belgian Spa Grand Prix in a fair race with Kimi Raikonnen of Ferrari. Lewis missed out a hairpin, but he let Kimi back in front, so what advantage had Lewis gained from his actions on the race track. Lewis’ actions did not deny Felipe Massa a race win, as he finished 14 seconds down the race track. The decision hurts the moral integrity of motor racing as a sport, lets hope FIA’s governing body act quickly and reverse the judgement from the race marshalls.

  • Hamilton should keep his win, he slowed down to let raikkonen past then re-took him again by slip streaming; if he is supposed to have gained a speed option, then how about the move raikkonen made when he overshot the bend a few corners later, and then had a slingshot out behind hamilton, and then using that momentum, overtook hamilton before he finally spun off; this is making the F1 racing a waste of time if ferrari are going to be given some sort of preferential treatment and McLaren keep getting penalised

  • I think Lewis Hamilton won fair and square. To have the win taken away from him by the stewards is absolutely disgraceful. Obviously if he was in a Ferrari nothing would have been said. Why is it McLaren are stil being penalised for last year?
    After attending F1 Grand Prix at Silverstone in 2007 and 2008, it was clear Lewis Hamilton brought a record number of fans to the circuit. Lewis Hamilton has brought excitement back into F1. A few years back didn’t the FIA complain about the lack of fans.
    What has Lewis Hamilton got to do or not do, to be fairly treated? Fans are not after favouritism, just fair play. The FIA need to get there act together as they seem to be backing one horse!

  • I think not. Having read exactly what the stewards have had to say i can see what they mean. People should look into things before jumping to LH’s defence just because he is British.

  • For Hamilton to receive a 25 second penalty is totally outrageous. Lewis drove, as he always drives, professionally and beyond reproach. What is the point of watching Formula 1 when judges can alter the outcome so easily. They made a decision on a move they deem to be an unfair advantage when the rest of us mortals deemed the move to be good racing. Will future formula 1 races see drivers too afraid to get within 2 feet of another car “just in case”. It appears that recent decisions made by judges are not fair and equal from one race to another. Why does it feel that Hamilton is being singled out!

  • The losers here are the fans Hamilton’s win was one of the most exciting I have seen in years and I walked away exhilarated, I am a not a Hamilton fan so was disappointed with the result but I do not want to see Ferrari win races in this manner, I like many other people I have spoken to will no longer follow the Grand Prix if this result stands, as I said the losers are the fans, interesting to see what Niki Lauder had to say on the matter!
    http://www.itv-f1.com/news_article.aspx?id=43875


Leave a Reply